PRODUCT DOCUMENTATION

BankRegX Docs

Understand how BankRegX applies AI, approved expert methodology, regulatory intelligence and governed human review to support professional control judgement.

01

Ask

Interrogate controls, audit, risk and regulatory questions.

02

Assess

Apply governed methodology to control and professional judgement.

03

Monitor

Connect regulatory developments to relevant risks and controls.

04

Learn

Capture expert review through a controlled human-governance process.

BankRegX combines AI analysis, regulatory information and approved expert methodology to support controls, audit, risk and compliance judgement.

INPUTProfessional question
→
RETRIEVALRelevant approved methodology
→
EVIDENCEFacts, sources and context
→
ASSESSMENTBankRegX judgement
→
GOVERNANCEHuman expert review
Only approved methodology is intended to influence BankRegX assessments. Draft, deprecated and unreviewed guidance is excluded from the active intelligence layer.

Evidence-led

BankRegX seeks to distinguish information that is actually known from assumptions and professional judgement.

Risk-based

A control is assessed against the risk it is intended to mitigate rather than simply against a checklist.

Human-governed

Feedback and proposed methodology changes are reviewed before they can influence future assessments.

BankRegX is designed to support defensible professional judgement. It does not treat completeness of a description as evidence that a control is effective.

01
Establish the facts
Identify what the user or source actually states before drawing conclusions.
02
Identify material unknowns
Separate missing information from evidence that is genuinely required to reach the assessment.
03
Understand the underlying risk
Assess what could go wrong and the point at which the relevant harm may occur.
04
Assess risk-to-control alignment
Consider whether the control mechanism is capable of mitigating the stated risk with appropriate timing, scope, precision and response.
05
Separate design from operation
Do not require operating-effectiveness evidence in order to reach a control-design conclusion.
06
Reach a qualified judgement
Provide the clearest supported conclusion while being transparent about material uncertainty.
CENTRAL QUESTIONIs this control, as designed, actually capable of mitigating the stated risk?

BankRegX assessment records can retain information about the methodology and external sources associated with an assessment. This supports later review of the basis on which the AI-assisted judgement was produced.

ASSESSMENT

Response record

A successful assessment can be associated with a unique response identifier.

METHODOLOGY

Guidance identity

Relevant approved expert principles can be recorded against the assessment.

VERSION

Methodology version

The version of methodology used can be retained with the original assessment.

SOURCES

External evidence

Where live research is used, the browsed source information can be retained for traceability.

Illustrative assessment record

{
  "responseId": "ASSESSMENT_DOCUMENT_ID",

  "methodologyTraceSchemaVersion": 1,

  "methodologyTrace": [
    {
      "guidanceId": "BRX-G-XXXXXXXX",
      "documentId": "GUIDANCE_DOCUMENT_ID",
      "version": 1,
      "title": "Expert methodology principle",
      "category": "control_design",
      "subcategory": "risk_control_alignment",
      "priority": "critical"
    }
  ],

  "browsedPages": [
    {
      "title": "Authoritative source",
      "url": "https://..."
    }
  ]
}
Historical records created before methodology-version tracing was introduced may not contain an exact version. BankRegX should not infer a historical methodology version where it was not recorded.